The gap shows up when it's already there
Yesterday's spreadsheet knows nothing of the morning's absences, the order peak or the slowed conveyor. The delay is discovered at the hour it can no longer be recovered.
Chargement...
Forecast volumes sit on one side, available hours on the other, equipment throughput in a third tool. Workin brings them together continuously, by day, shift, team and job. The gap is seen as it appears, not when it shows on the dock.
The gap, by day, shift and role
Corrective actions compared
Decision logged and sent
Traceable · Confirmed · Real time
The problem is not a lack of data. It sits in the WMS, time & attendance, the forecasts. The problem is that it is only reconciled after the fact.
Yesterday's spreadsheet knows nothing of the morning's absences, the order peak or the slowed conveyor. The delay is discovered at the hour it can no longer be recovered.
Calls, WhatsApp, a walk down the aisles. The team leader hunts for cover on the phone while their zone runs without them. Nothing is compared, nothing is tracked.
Each manager has their own file, rules and thresholds. Network management gets a consolidated picture the next day, once the local decision is already made.
Workin reads your existing data and computes the gap continuously. When it appears, the manager sees the possible corrective actions, ranked by cost then impact, and decides.
Forecast volumes, planned hours, throughput of automated equipment. The volume at risk is computed, the severity ranked. Teams and machines in the same queue.
Cross-team reassignment, rest-day change, overtime, temp staff. Cost and coverage side by side, to decide with figures rather than over the phone.
Once made, the decision goes to the workers concerned on their phone. Answers come back. The time-stamped log keeps who decided what, and when.
Decisions stay local. The network sees the gaps, the decisions made and their effect, with no manual consolidation and no next-day file.
Regional management sees where the gap is not yet resolved, and which lever was chosen elsewhere for a comparable situation.
Severity thresholds and action costs: defined once for the network, applied everywhere, decided by the manager who knows their dock.
Workload and capacity on record day after day, on every site: the basis for any optimisation to come.
Operations control
Detecting a gap is pointless if the response goes back to the phone. Workin closes the loop: the gap is seen, decided, executed and confirmed in one place.
Open topicIntegration
The real issue is not adding another tool. It is connecting what your systems already know to the teams executing on the floor, without adding friction for management or field teams.
Open topicFrom your existing systems: WMS, time & attendance / HRIS, activity forecasts and other available sources. API or SFTP connectors, or file imports, depending on the agreed scope. Each system remains authoritative for its data.
No. Workin detects, computes and compares. The decision stays with the site manager, who knows their dock. It is then sent and logged.
No. We start with the floor, with the worker application, from your existing files. Workload / capacity control then plugs into your activity data, on the scope you choose.
Equipment constraints are considered alongside team capacity in the operational picture. Workin does not control equipment.
Let's look at your volumes, headcount, share of temp staff and overtime, and what continuous detection would change for your operation.