The alert without the channel
A dashboard flags a shortfall. Then the team leader makes calls. Nobody knows, at 15:00, how many reinforcements actually said yes.
Chargement...
Two layers, one platform. Pulse reconciles workload and capacity and puts the corrective actions side by side. Connect sends the decision to workers on their phone and brings their answers back. In between, the manager decides, at a workstation or on the move.
Pulse detects and compares
The manager decides
Connect executes and reports back
Traceable · Confirmed · Real time
Many sites have a detection tool, or a field channel. Rarely both, connected. The break is always in the same place: between the decision and its execution.
A dashboard flags a shortfall. Then the team leader makes calls. Nobody knows, at 15:00, how many reinforcements actually said yes.
Instructions go out, requests are processed, the schedule is up to date. But the workload / capacity gap is still discovered too late.
When detection and execution live in separate systems, the picture does not update by itself. It has to be rebuilt, and it is rebuilt after the fact.
One platform, from the gap to the confirmation. The picture updates as answers come in, with nothing to re-enter.
Workload / capacity gap by day, shift, team and job. Volume at risk, severity, corrective actions ranked by cost then impact. Automated equipment included.
At a workstation or on the move, they choose the lever and validate it on the line. The decision is time-stamped in the log.
The request lands on the phone of each worker concerned: I accept, I decline. Every answer updates the coverage, for the manager and for the network.
Connect is not only for Pulse decisions. It is the everyday field application: rolled out in two weeks from your existing files, with nothing to install.
Each worker sees their schedule, shifts and balances. They request leave, report a delay or absence, offer availability. The manager processes it on the line.
What used to go through WhatsApp, paper or a verbal briefing arrives in a structured channel, with read receipts, translation and audio.
Access from a personal phone, with onboarding in under 30 minutes. What is published stays fully under the organisation's control.
Operations control
On large sites, the gap between the volume to handle and the hours available shows up when it is already there. Workin detects it earlier, and puts the corrective actions side by side to decide.
Open topicUse Case
On large warehouse sites, what really organizes teams often sits outside the system: instructions, availability signals, field reports. The result is more friction for supervisors and workers alike.
Open topicYes. That is the recommended rollout order: one site in two weeks, from your existing files. Workload / capacity control then plugs into your activity data.
No. The worker sees what concerns them: their schedule, their requests, requests addressed to them. The manager sees the gap, the corrective actions and their team's answers. The network sees the sites.
It is time-stamped in the log, sent to the workers concerned, and coverage updates with each answer. Nothing to re-enter.
Agencies are connected partners. Requests reach them through agreed channels, separately from team members’ phone access. The scope is defined with you for the first site.
20 minutes. No generic demo. You leave with a clear picture of what Workin can, or can't, do for your operation.